Louisiana House Bill HB938

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 5/4/10

Caption

To increase emission inspection fees (OR +$3,030,000 LF RV See Note)

Impact

The increased fees collected from emissions inspections primarily fund local mass transit systems, directing seven dollars from each inspection fee specifically for mass transit initiatives. This financial strategy is expected to bolster public transportation options within the affected parishes and support efforts to reduce ozone emissions through improved transit access, which aligns with the state’s broader environmental goals.

Summary

House Bill 938, introduced by Representative Michael Jackson, proposes an increase in the fees associated with motor vehicle emissions inspections in areas designated as nonattainment zones for ozone standards. The bill aims to amend existing laws to raise the inspection fee from eight dollars to fifteen dollars for those vehicles. This change targets parishes and municipalities that the Environmental Protection Agency has classified as 'serious' or worse in terms of air quality issues, ultimately aiming to minimize environmental impact and promote better air quality standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 938 appears cautiously positive among environmental advocates who support the measure for its potential to improve air quality and enhance public transportation. However, concerns have been raised by some representatives and citizens about the burden of increased fees on vehicle owners and the effectiveness of those funds being used effectively for their intended purpose. The debate highlights a commitment to environmental responsibility, but also raises questions about financial impacts on the public.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions around the economic implications of the fee increase, with critics arguing that such additional costs could disproportionately affect low-income residents who may rely on older vehicles. Additionally, there were debates on whether the projected benefits to mass transit systems and environmental quality justify the financial burden placed on vehicle owners. Proponents of the bill contend that the long-term gains in air quality and enhanced public transit options would ultimately benefit all citizens.