Louisiana House Bill HB962

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 5/12/10
• Engrossed: 5/20/10
• Refer: 5/24/10
• Report Pass: 6/7/10
• Enrolled: 6/16/10
• Chaptered: 6/29/10
• Passed: 6/29/10

Caption

Provides relative to the review process for charter school applications (EN SEE FISC NOTE EX See Note)

Impact

If passed, HB 962 would significantly impact the way charter schools are established and renewed in Louisiana. By extending the review period for charter applications, it allows local school boards to conduct fuller assessments of each proposal, which may enhance the overall quality of charter schools in the state. Additionally, the bill requires local school boards to make available any vacant facilities for charter schools at fair market value, which could help facilitate the establishment of new charter schools and provide them with necessary resources.

Summary

House Bill 962 seeks to amend the charter school application and renewal process in Louisiana, specifically adjusting the timelines within which local school boards must review charter proposals. The bill establishes that local school boards must formally act upon charter proposals within ninety days of submission instead of the previous thirty days, enabling a more thorough examination process. In addition, the bill mandates a transparent application review process that engages independent third-party evaluations, ensuring that charter proposals meet educational, financial, and operational standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 962 appears to be largely supportive among advocates of charter schools who argue that a comprehensive review process enhances accountability and educational outcomes. However, there may also be some concerns regarding the ability of local school boards to adequately manage the extended review timelines and the implications of making school facilities available. Those in favor contend that this bill is a necessary step to ensure that charter schools can effectively operate within a structured regulatory framework.

Contention

Notable points of contention around HB 962 include the balance of power between local school boards and chartering groups. While advocates argue that a rigorous review process is essential for maintaining educational standards, critics may highlight the risk of bureaucratic delay in approving new charter schools. The bill attempts to strike a balance by ensuring transparency and compliance with educational standards while addressing concerns related to timely access to public resources and facilities for charter schools.