Louisiana House Bill HCR199

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/25/10
• Engrossed: 5/25/10

Caption

Urges and requests the city of Shreveport to allow for public comment regarding closure of the railroad crossings

Impact

The resolution seeks to mitigate negative impacts on the local population by advocating for community engagement before significant infrastructure changes are enacted. It highlights the city’s past practices of notifying citizens about developments that may affect them, suggesting a need for consistency in governance and transparency. By calling for public commentary, it attempts to ensure that local voices are heard in decision-making processes that directly affect their daily lives.

Summary

HCR199 is a concurrent resolution that urges and requests the city of Shreveport to postpone the closure of specific railroad crossings in response to community concerns. The resolution emphasizes the importance of allowing local residents to voice their opinions about the implications of these closures. Particularly, it targets three railroad crossings scheduled for closure, raising alarms regarding the potential hardships these closures may cause for nearby communities, especially in terms of access by emergency services and impacts on property values.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR199 appears to be supportive among community members who are concerned about the potential repercussions of the railroad closings. There is a clear call for action from citizens who feel that their interests have not been adequately represented or considered by city officials. This grassroots push for public involvement showcases an underlying desire for democratic participation in local governance.

Contention

While HCR199 is not a legislative bill that enacts law but rather a request to city leadership, it highlights the tension between municipal decision-making and community response. Notably, the resolution reflects broader issues regarding urban planning and infrastructure management, where state and local entities must balance logistical needs with community welfare. The urgency of the request suggests that if the city proceeds without addressing community concerns, it may face backlash from residents who feel disenfranchised.