Louisiana House Bill HCR223

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/4/10
• Refer: 6/7/10
• Report Pass: 6/15/10

Caption

Requests legislative sergeants at arms to require persons entering the capitol to be subject to search for weapons, with very limited exceptions

Impact

The implementation of HCR223 will result in increased security at the Louisiana state Capitol, impacting laws related to public access and safety protocols. This resolution is positioned to amend current policies that provide specific exceptions for various individuals, thus potentially creating a more secure environment that reflects contemporary concerns about safety in government buildings. By limiting exceptions mostly to legislators and specific officials, the bill prioritizes the physical safety of those within the Capitol premises, balancing public accessibility with necessary security measures.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution No. 223 (HCR223) calls for enhanced security measures at the state Capitol by requesting the legislative sergeants at arms to require all non-legislative individuals entering the building to undergo weapon screening. This initiative aims to ensure the safety of government officials, employees, and the public by limiting access to only those who are screened effectively. The resolution highlights the need for stringent control over entry points and calls for changes in procedures regarding the issuance of identification cards for access to the Capitol.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HCR223 appears to be largely supportive among legislators concerned with ensuring the safety of public spaces while simultaneously addressing the need to maintain accessibility for citizens. Advocates for the bill emphasize the importance of creating a secure environment, especially in light of recent concerns related to safety in government facilities. However, some apprehension may exist regarding the implementation logistics and the way it may affect public access to governmental processes in a broader sense.

Contention

Despite the general support, discussions may arise around the implications of such resolutions as they could present challenges in maintaining a balance between security and accessibility. Critics may argue that overly strict security measures could deter public engagement and transparency. The resolution necessitates careful considerations of how to implement such screening protocols without infringing upon the rights of citizens to access their government freely.