Louisiana House Bill HCR61

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/10
• Refer: 3/31/10
• Report Pass: 4/21/10
• Engrossed: 5/3/10
• Report Pass: 6/9/10
• Passed: 6/10/10

Caption

Requests the Dept. of State Civil Service to develop and the State Civil Service Commission to adopt an executive service program

Impact

The proposed executive service program outlined in HCR61 is expected to empower state agencies by providing more flexibility in building management teams. By recognizing outstanding skill and efficiency among senior managers, the program aims to align management efforts more closely with agency goals. The movement toward adopting modern management practices signifies a progressive approach to state administration, intending to make government functions more efficient and effective.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 61 (HCR61) urges the Department of State Civil Service to formulate and the State Civil Service Commission to establish an executive service program aimed at enhancing the management of senior positions within state agencies. This initiative is positioned as a means to improve administrative and program efficiency while ensuring economic prudence within state governance. The resolution reflects a commitment to operational effectiveness and responsiveness to citizens' expectations for a competent state government.

Sentiment

Discussion surrounding HCR61 indicates a generally positive sentiment towards the resolution, particularly among those who prioritize government efficiency and responsiveness. Proponents of the resolution believe that such a program will lead to improved governance and better service delivery for state residents. However, it does not appear to have elicited significant opposition, suggesting a consensus on the importance of enhancing management in state agencies.

Contention

While HCR61 is largely viewed as a positive initiative, it raises questions regarding the implementation of an executive service program and the criteria for manager selection and evaluation. The efficacy of the program will depend on how well it is executed and whether it can achieve its stated goals without fostering an environment of favoritism or nepotism in state appointments. The resolution entails the submission of a report on the progress of these initiatives to legislative committees, which will be crucial for maintaining accountability.