Louisiana House Bill HCR71

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/31/10
• Refer: 4/5/10

Caption

Directs La.'s attorney general to withdraw from the suit challenging the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 on constitutional grounds

Impact

The impact of HCR71, if passed, would facilitate the implementation of health reform measures outlined in the PPACA. These measures include tax credits for small businesses providing health insurance, a temporary reinsurance program for early retirees, and various changes to insurance practices such as prohibiting the denial of coverage due to pre-existing conditions. By withdrawing from the lawsuit, Louisiana could reap the benefits of expanded health coverage and protections that the PPACA affords to its residents, potentially reducing the number of uninsured individuals and preventing premature deaths due to lack of medical care.

Summary

HCR71 is a Louisiana House Concurrent Resolution that directs the state's attorney general to withdraw from a lawsuit challenging the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) of 2010 on constitutional grounds. The resolution emphasizes that the lawsuit is not in the best interest of Louisiana residents, especially considering that a significant portion of the state's population lacks health insurance. The resolution advocates for the implementation of various provisions of the PPACA, which are aimed at improving health care access and affordability for citizens of Louisiana.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR71 appears to be largely supportive of health care reform, reflecting a desire to improve health outcomes for the citizens of Louisiana. Proponents argue that the resolution aligns with the urgent need to address the health care crisis in the state, where many individuals suffer from inadequate access to medical services. However, there may be some contention from political factions that oppose the PPACA, viewing involvement in the lawsuit as a necessary stand against what they perceive as federal overreach. This dichotomy illustrates a significant divide in perspectives on health care policy within the state.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding HCR71 relates to the ongoing debate about state versus federal authority in health care reform. Advocates of HCR71 argue that by withdrawing from the lawsuit, the state can move forward with implementing beneficial reforms, while opponents may view it as capitulation to federal mandates that they believe undermine state sovereignty. There may also be concerns regarding how the implementation of PPACA provisions may impact insurance premiums and the overall health care landscape in Louisiana in the long run.