Louisiana Senate Bill SB313

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Requires applicants for certain permits to attend any public hearings on the proposed permit. (8/15/10)

Impact

The modification in law introduced by SB313 particularly affects companies seeking major permits related to hazardous waste and pollutants. The requirement for applicants to attend public hearings is expected to foster greater accountability and public engagement during the decision-making process. Advocates of the bill argue that this change will provide communities with a chance to voice their concerns and ensure that local environmental priorities are heard, while also facilitating a comprehensive understanding of the proposed activities by the permitting entities.

Summary

Senate Bill 313 aims to enhance regulatory oversight in Louisiana by mandating that applicants for specific environmental permits must attend public hearings concerning their applications. This bill builds on existing laws which require applicants to submit an environmental assessment as part of their permit application process. By necessitating attendance at public hearings, the bill seeks to increase transparency and community involvement in the permitting process for the treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous and solid wastes, as well as the discharge of pollutants.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment towards SB313 appears supportive, particularly within environmental advocacy groups and local communities who advocate for stronger oversight of industrial practices. They view the bill as a positive step towards protecting public health and the environment. However, there may be some apprehension from businesses who feel that the added requirement could lead to longer approval processes and potential delays in permit acquisition, which could impact operational timelines.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB313 include the potential impact on businesses seeking permits, who may argue that mandatory attendance at public hearings adds an extra layer of bureaucracy that could hinder economic development. Conversely, proponents emphasize the importance of community oversight and the need for applicants to face the public and articulate their plans directly, which they believe enhances the regulatory framework. Overall, the discussions emphasize a balancing act between regulatory rigor and business efficiency.