Louisiana Senate Bill SB397

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/6/10
• Engrossed: 4/12/10
• Refer: 4/13/10
• Report Pass: 5/18/10
• Enrolled: 6/1/10
• Chaptered: 6/8/10
• Passed: 6/8/10

Caption

Authorizes transfer and acceptance of certain properties by the Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism and by the Department of Wildlife and Fisheris. (8/15/10)

Impact

The impact of SB 397 extends to the management and utilization of state properties. By allowing the transfer of these properties to local governance and private individuals, the bill potentially enhances local administration capabilities and resource management of the lands in question. It opens new opportunities for community development and recreational uses, impacting local governance and land stewardship. The bill signifies a move towards localized control over state properties, aligning with the interests of the Caldwell Parish authority.

Summary

Senate Bill 397 authorizes the transfer of specific state properties in Caldwell Parish, Louisiana, to facilitate a property exchange involving the Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism and the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. This legislation is focused on expediting the process of transferring ownership of parcels of land with a clear delineation of the properties involved. Notably, the bill stipulates that mineral rights will be excluded from the transfer, which is a significant aspect considering the value and implications associated with such rights.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB 397 appears to be supportive among local officials and stakeholders who recognize the benefits of facilitating property management and promoting local interest. However, there may be occasional concerns about the responsible management of lands post-transfer and the long-term implications of excluding mineral rights, which are often a significant economic factor in Louisiana.

Contention

While there seems to be general approval for the intention behind SB 397, the central contention lies in the details of the land transfer, specifically regarding the mineral rights. Critics may raise concerns over the adequacy of measures in place to ensure that the interests of the state are safeguarded once the properties are conveyed. The bill requires negotiations and agreements between state officials and local authorities, which raises questions about transparency and accountability in the transfer process.