Louisiana Senate Bill SB5

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Corrects the name of a certain entity allocated monies from the St. Tammany Parish Fund. (7/1/10) (OR NO IMPACT RV See Note)

Impact

The bill's implementation is set to become effective on July 1, 2010, and it primarily affects how funds are appropriated and allocated within St. Tammany Parish. By correcting the name to the St. Tammany Parish Development District, the bill seeks to clarify the economic objectives of this entity, ensuring that such funds are directed towards the intended development initiatives. This correction ensures legal clarity and continuity in funding practices that affect the economic landscape of the parish.

Summary

Senate Bill 5, introduced by Senator Crowe, is a legislative amendment aimed at correcting the name of a specific entity that receives funding from the St. Tammany Parish Fund. The bill redefines the allocation of state sales tax revenues generated from room rentals in St. Tammany Parish, specifying that 85% goes to the St. Tammany Parish Tourist Commission, while 15% is allocated to the renamed St. Tammany Parish Development District. This change is straightforward but reflects broader efforts to streamline funding processes within local governance.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB5 appears to be neutral, as it focuses on administrative corrections rather than introducing significant policy changes. The nature of the discussion surrounding the bill did not generate strong opinions for or against it, likely because it pertains to procedural amendments rather than controversial subject matter. Legislative members seem to agree on the necessity of the correction without significant public debate.

Contention

Notably, there was minimal contention presented regarding the bill as it involves a minor correction instead of substantive reforms or funding changes. While local authorities and stakeholders may appreciate the clear definition of the development entity's name for administrative purposes, the bill does not spark divisions in larger policy debates typically associated with fiscal allocation or economic development. This lack of contention suggests a consensus among the legislative body regarding the bill's aim.