Louisiana Senate Bill SB685

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/31/10
• Refer: 3/31/10
• Report Pass: 5/11/10
• Engrossed: 5/17/10
• Refer: 5/18/10
• Report Pass: 5/26/10
• Enrolled: 6/9/10
• Chaptered: 6/17/10
• Passed: 6/17/10

Caption

Creates the crime of out-of-state bail jumping. (8/15/10)

Impact

The introduction of this bill amends existing laws to add specific penalties for out-of-state bail jumping. Under this legislation, if a defendant is found guilty, they may face a fine of up to $2,000 and imprisonment ranging from one to three years. This enhancement of penalties aims to deter individuals from leaving the state to escape their legal responsibilities, thereby reinforcing the integrity of the judicial process.

Summary

Senate Bill 685 aims to address the issue of individuals who fail to appear in court by establishing a new crime termed 'out-of-state bail jumping.' This law is specifically designed for cases where a defendant intentionally leaves the state to avoid attending their court hearing. By creating this legal framework, the bill seeks to ensure that individuals who disregard their court obligations while outside the state can be held accountable.

Sentiment

Reactions to SB685 among lawmakers and the community indicate a general sentiment that underscores the importance of attendance in court proceedings. Supporters of the bill outline the significance of accountability and the necessity of this law in preventing individuals from evading justice by simply relocating temporarily. However, there may be concerns raised regarding the potential implications for those who may leave the state for legitimate reasons, prompting discussions about fairness and the balance of justice.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB685 include debates about the effectiveness and fairness of imposing such severe penalties for out-of-state bail jumping. Critics might argue that the legislation could disproportionately affect certain populations who may face unavoidable circumstances that lead them to leave the state. Additionally, discussing the burden of proof placed upon defendants regarding notice can lead to concerns about the potential for unjust outcomes, wherein individuals may face penalties without adequate notification of their required court appearances.