Louisiana Senate Bill SB721

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/19/10
• Refer: 4/19/10
• Report Pass: 4/26/10
• Engrossed: 4/28/10
• Refer: 4/29/10
• Report Pass: 5/24/10
• Enrolled: 6/9/10
• Chaptered: 6/17/10
• Passed: 6/17/10

Caption

Provides for an automobile allowance for the assessor in Washington Parish. (8/15/10) (EN SEE FISC NOTE LF EX See Note)

Impact

The enactment of SB721 will modify existing financial provisions for elected officials in Washington Parish, particularly affecting the budget and expense management of the assessor's office. By instituting this automobile expense allowance, the bill aims to support the mobility of the assessor in carrying out their duties, potentially leading to improved productivity and efficiency in their role. Since the funding will come from surplus funds, it is designed to be cost-neutral to taxpayers.

Summary

Senate Bill 721 introduces a provision for an automobile expense allowance specifically for the assessor of Washington Parish. The bill allows the assessor to receive an allowance amounting to fifteen percent of their annual salary, provided that they maintain a specified level of automobile insurance. This allowance is to be funded through surplus funds from the assessor's office, ensuring no additional financial burden is placed on state or local governing bodies.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB721 is supportive, particularly from those advocating for reasonable allowances for elected officials to effectively perform their functions. The provision for a defined automobile allowance demonstrates a recognition of the needs associated with the role of the assessor. However, as with many financial legislations, there are voices of caution regarding ongoing costs and ensuring that such allowances are justified and adequately monitored.

Contention

While the bill appears straightforward, it may raise concerns regarding the adequacy of the specified automobile insurance requirements and potential implications on the overall budgeting of the assessor's office. Critics might question whether the percentage allowance is appropriate or whether there should be stricter oversight on how surplus funds are utilized. The balance between providing necessary support to public officials and ensuring fiscal responsibility remains a point of discussion in legislative circles.