Louisiana House Bill HB251

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/25/11

Caption

Provides relative to the membership of the Board of Supervisors of Community and Technical Colleges (OR NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

The enactment of HB 251 will modify current state laws regulating the membership and appointments of the Board of Supervisors. The bill retains the overall structure of the board, which consists of 15 members appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate. The existing criteria for member nominations from various organizations, such as the Louisiana AFL-CIO and the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry, remain in place, ensuring a diverse representation that balances various interests in educational governance.

Summary

House Bill 251 aims to modify the composition of the Board of Supervisors of Community and Technical Colleges in Louisiana by adding new criteria for member appointments. Specifically, the bill mandates that one member must be appointed from among three candidates nominated by the Louisiana Literary Alliance. This addition reflects an effort to ensure representation from the literacy community on the board, which oversees the management of public postsecondary education institutions that focus on vocational-technical education.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be broadly supportive, as it emphasizes the importance of literacy and educational oversight. Stakeholders who advocate for improved literacy programs and vocational education likely view this change as a positive step toward enhancing the board’s capabilities to address educational needs effectively. However, there could also be lingering questions from those who fear that additional appointments might dilute other critical representations or priorities on the board.

Contention

Despite the overall positive reception, some contention may arise regarding the specific nomination process from the Louisiana Literary Alliance. Concerns could reflect the potential for politicization of such appointments or whether nominees might adequately represent diverse perspectives within the literacy community. Additionally, debates may surface regarding the extent to which such measures genuinely reflect stakeholder interests in actual governance versus simply expanding representation.