Louisiana House Bill HB341

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/25/11
• Refer: 5/16/11
• Refer: 5/17/11
• Report Pass: 5/23/11
• Engrossed: 6/1/11
• Report Pass: 6/14/11
• Enrolled: 6/19/11
• Chaptered: 7/13/11
• Passed: 7/13/11

Caption

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides for assets and property of the Patient's Compensation Fund (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

The establishment of this fund, if approved, aims to manage surcharges collected from healthcare providers and filing fees from claimants effectively. Assets within this fund will include reserves set aside for future claims and earnings from investments, positioning it as a source of financial stability for claimants without the reliance on state appropriations or tax revenue. Moreover, the creation of the Private Custodial Fund signifies a possible shift in how malpractice claims are processed and compensated, potentially offering a streamlined approach compared to traditional state-managed funds.

Summary

House Bill 341 proposes an amendment to the Constitution of Louisiana to establish a private custodial fund known as the 'Patient's Compensation Fund'. This fund is intended to provide benefits and protection to medical malpractice claimants and private health care provider members. The bill outlines that the assets of this fund will not constitute state property and thus will not fall under the purview of state treasury regulations, assuring autonomy over its financial management and operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 341 appears to be largely supportive among legislators, as indicated by the unanimous Senate vote of 38-0 in favor of its passage. This level of agreement suggests a consensus on the need for a dedicated, privately managed fund to address the complexities surrounding medical malpractice claims. However, the nature of such private funds might raise questions among stakeholders, including healthcare providers and patients, regarding its operational transparency and accountability in managing sensitive legal obligations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the fund's exemption from state appropriation and its distinction from state general funds, which may lead to concerns about oversight and the potential for insufficient resources for claimants in case of large-scale malpractice claims. Critics might argue that such a system could favor healthcare providers over patients, especially if financial management decisions are not subject to rigorous public scrutiny. As HB 341 moves forward, discussions may also delve into how such a fund could influence the ethics of healthcare practice and patient rights.