Louisiana House Bill HB369

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/25/11
• Report Pass: 5/9/11
• Engrossed: 5/16/11
• Refer: 5/17/11
• Report Pass: 6/6/11
• Refer: 6/7/11
• Report Pass: 6/15/11
• Enrolled: 6/23/11
• Chaptered: 7/1/11
• Passed: 7/1/11

Caption

Relative to the Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana (TRSL), allows certain reemployed retirees to receive retirement benefits upon reemployment (EN INCREASE APV)

Impact

The impact of HB 369 on state laws is significant as it modifies existing regulations governing teacher reemployment and retirement benefits. By permitting retirees to continue receiving benefits while earning additional income, the bill attempts to provide more flexibility for educators and enhance the availability of teaching staff in adult education programs. The proposal also includes stipulations to limit earnings from reemployment, thereby safeguarding the fiscal integrity of the retirement system.

Summary

House Bill 369 focuses on amendments to the Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana (TRSL), primarily allowing certain retired teachers who are reemployed to receive their retirement benefits while working. The bill specifies that retired teachers assigned to adult education or literacy programs can return to work, earning limited amounts without losing their retirement benefits. This legislative change aims to facilitate experienced educators' involvement in adult education, thereby addressing staffing challenges in these programs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 369 appears to be supportive, particularly among educators and those focused on improving adult education opportunities. Proponents argue that the bill addresses critical shortages in adult education capacity and allows retired teachers to contribute their skills and experience without the fear of losing their benefits. However, there may be concerns regarding the potential financial implications for the retirement system if not managed correctly.

Contention

While the bill has gained support, notable points of contention may arise regarding the funding of its implementation and the potential long-term effects on the retirement system's financial health. Opponents may raise concerns about the necessity of such an amendment and its impacts on current active teachers, who might face increased competition for positions from reemployed retirees. The need for proper oversight and reporting by the employing agencies is emphasized to ensure compliance and avoid unintended consequences.