Louisiana House Bill HB376

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/25/11
• Report Pass: 6/8/11
• Engrossed: 6/13/11
• Report Pass: 6/19/11
• Enrolled: 6/20/11
• Chaptered: 6/24/11
• Passed: 6/24/11

Caption

Authorizes the expenditure of public funds to promote the use of online programs of public institutions of higher education (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The introduction of HB376 is poised to impact state laws by amending existing statutes related to the expenditure of public funds for advertising. Specifically, it adds a new provision that enables higher education institutions to allocate funds towards initiatives aimed at marketing their online programs. This could potentially broaden access to education for a range of learners and encourage institutions to invest in innovative learning models that address contemporary educational demands.

Summary

House Bill 376 aims to authorize public institutions of higher education in Louisiana to use public funds for advertising purposes that promote their online services and programs. This legislative effort is intended to enhance the visibility of online educational offerings, which have become increasingly important in the contemporary educational landscape. By allowing these institutions to advertise their online programs, the bill seeks to bridge the gap between traditional higher education and the diverse needs of students who may prefer or require online learning options.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB376 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among advocates of online education. Proponents argue that the bill will foster greater awareness of the educational opportunities available to students through online formats, thus enhancing enrollment and accessibility. However, it may also face scrutiny from taxpayers and budget-conscious legislators who might question the appropriateness of using public funds for advertising.

Contention

Notable points of contention associated with HB376 may center on the allocation of public resources for advertising purposes. Critics may express concerns regarding the effectiveness and necessity of such expenditures, fearing that marketing online programs could divert funds away from essential educational services. Additionally, discussions may arise about the accountability and transparency in how these funds are utilized by the institutions, challenging the appropriateness of this funding approach within the education system.