Louisiana House Bill HCR105

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/17/11
• Refer: 5/18/11
• Report Pass: 5/24/11
• Engrossed: 6/8/11
• Report Pass: 6/15/11
• Passed: 6/16/11

Caption

Requests the legislative auditor to issue a report concerning boards and commissions that have failed to comply with the requirements of Chapter 20 of Title 49 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950

Impact

The request by HCR105 aims to promote accountability among various state boards and commissions responsible for managing taxpayer resources and providing oversight. By ensuring compliance with statutory publication requirements, the resolution emphasizes the importance of communicating government actions and supports informed citizen engagement. Failure to comply with these transparency measures undermines public trust and limits the ability of citizens to interact meaningfully with their government.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 105 (HCR105) urges and requests the legislative auditor to prepare and publish a report concerning boards and commissions that have not fully complied with the requirements outlined in Chapter 20 of Title 49 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950. The resolution seeks to enhance transparency in government operations by identifying agencies that fail to provide essential information as mandated by law. This includes meeting notices, membership details, and financial records, which are intended to be accessible through a publicly maintained website.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR105 appears to be largely supportive, with consensus on the need for greater transparency and accountability in state governance. Elected officials and advocates for government reform generally express the view that enhancing public access to government information is crucial for building trust and efficiency within state institutions. However, concerns may arise regarding the potential backlash from agencies that might view the increased scrutiny as an additional regulatory burden.

Contention

Possible contention stemming from HCR105 could revolve around the challenges of achieving full compliance from various boards and commissions, potentially facing resistance or pushback from entities that argue against the feasibility of the requirements. Additionally, the resolution raises questions about resources allocated for monitoring compliance and the implications for those boards that fail to meet obligations, signaling an ongoing need for effective oversight authorities.