Louisiana House Bill HCR170

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/13/11
• Engrossed: 6/13/11
• Passed: 6/16/11

Caption

Memorializes congress oppose cuts to Social Security benefits

Impact

If passed and acted upon by Congress, HCR170 could influence federal policy on Social Security, potentially safeguarding the benefits it provides against any cuts. This resolution draws attention to the critical need for maintaining the current benefit levels, especially given that many recipients are elderly individuals on fixed incomes. Ensuring that these benefits remain intact is crucial for their financial security, given the current economic pressures demonstrated by rising prices in everyday living expenses such as food and medical care.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 170 (HCR170) seeks to memorialize the United States Congress to oppose any reductions in Social Security benefits for recipients. The resolution highlights the financial difficulties faced by nearly sixty million Americans dependent on these benefits, with further emphasis on the low average monthly payment amounts compared to the federal poverty guidelines. HCR170 addresses concerns regarding the absence of cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) since 2008, which severely affects recipients as they struggle to keep up with rising living costs, particularly for essential goods and services.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HCR170 is positive, reflecting bipartisan support for the protection of Social Security benefits. Lawmakers are cognizant of the vulnerabilities faced by senior citizens and low-income individuals who rely on these benefits. The discussions among legislators emphasized the need for Congress to understand the realities affecting Social Security recipients and the significance of upholding their benefits.

Contention

While HCR170 aims to unite legislators in support of Social Security recipients, it also raises questions about the broader implications of federal budgetary constraints and necessary reforms. Some may contend that maintaining or increasing benefits could strain government resources, leading to debates on fiscal responsibility versus the security of vulnerable populations. The resolution serves as a reminder of these tensions, advocating for the rights and needs of those reliant on Social Security in light of economic challenges.