Louisiana House Bill HCR181

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/14/11
• Engrossed: 6/15/11
• Passed: 6/16/11

Caption

Urges and requests the adoption of a rehabilitation subcode pilot program within the state uniform construction code for participating downtown development districts

Impact

If adopted, HCR181 would enable certain downtown development districts to follow the proposed New Jersey-style rehabilitation subcode for any construction or rehabilitation activities, allowing properties to maintain and enhance their historical significance while adhering to updated construction practices. The pilot program is set to be in effect for three years, during which participating districts will monitor and report on the benefits and effectiveness of the subcode. This alignment with historic preservation efforts is crucial in maintaining the cultural identity of the areas involved.

Summary

HCR181, introduced by Representative Arnold, urges the Louisiana State Uniform Construction Code Council to adopt a rehabilitation subcode pilot program specifically designed for participating downtown development districts. The motivation behind this resolution is the recognition of the challenges presented by existing construction standards in the state, particularly as they pertain to older and historic properties. The bill draws on successful models from other states, like New Jersey, where the introduction of a rehabilitation subcode has led to substantial increases in the investment in older property rehabilitation projects. This initiative seeks to promote not only the preservation of historical sites but also the broader economic rejuvenation of downtown areas.

Sentiment

The sentiment expressed around HCR181 is largely positive among stakeholders who recognize the economic potential and cultural importance of preserving historic buildings. Proponents of the bill highlight the advantages of providing clearer guidelines for the rehabilitation of these properties, which could stimulate both local economies and tourism. However, there are concerns about balancing the preservation of historical integrity with the need for modernization and safety in construction practices. Debate may arise around resource allocation and the logistical aspects of implementation, particularly regarding the education of code enforcement officials.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the specifics of how the rehabilitation subcode would be applied and the responsibilities of the local entities involved in the pilot program. Some community members may express reservations about the feasibility of adequately training officials and enforcing the new guidelines within the existing regulatory framework. There may also be discussions about the potential funding models for the rehabilitation projects initiated under this program and the sustainability of the pilot initiative after the original three-year period concludes.