Louisiana House Bill HR80

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/13/11
• Refer: 6/13/11
• Passed: 6/22/11

Caption

Provides an earlier prefiling deadline for legislation related to retirement

Impact

The amendment to House Rule No. 7.2(A) reflects a strategic shift towards better organization within the legislative framework of the Louisiana House of Representatives. By setting a specific timeline for prefiling retirement legislation, the bill seeks to enhance predictability and accountability within the legislative schedule. This regulation primarily impacts the planning phase of legislative sessions and aims to facilitate a smoother transition into discussions about retirement matters, which are often complex and require thorough debate and consideration.

Summary

House Resolution 80 (HR80), introduced by Representative Pearson, aims to amend the rules of the House of Representatives concerning the prefiling of bills and joint resolutions related to retirement. The primary change proposed by HR80 mandates that such legislative instruments must be prefiled by 5 p.m. on the forty-fifth calendar day prior to the commencement of the next regular session. This measure is intended to streamline the legislative process for retirement-related bills, ensuring they are adequately prepared for discussion ahead of time.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HR80 appears to be predominantly positive. Advocates of the bill argue that establishing a prefiling deadline can improve legislative efficiency, leading to more productive sessions. They contend that this structure allows members to focus on vital issues related to retirement without the last-minute rush associated with newly introduced bills. No significant opposition or contention has been indicated in the discussion or voting record, suggesting a consensus on this procedural enhancement within the House.

Contention

While HR80 has not sparked major contention, it does highlight the ongoing discussions regarding procedural efficiency within legislative bodies. Some may argue about the rigidity of the proposed timeline, suggesting it could limit the flexibility needed for urgent retirement-related issues that could arise unexpectedly. However, as it stands, the resolution appears to have overwhelming support, as evidenced by the unanimous voting outcome, with 93 yeas and no nays.