Louisiana Senate Bill SB197

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/25/11
• Report Pass: 5/31/11
• Refer: 6/8/11

Caption

Phases in an exemption of certain capital gains income of individuals 65 years of age or older from state individual income tax. (gov sig) (EG -$4,600,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

This legislation is expected to have a positive financial impact on senior citizens in Louisiana, effectively promoting economic stability for this demographic. By providing a substantial tax break, the state acknowledges the contributions of older individuals while attempting to bolster their disposable income. The exemption aligns with broader initiatives to support the financial well-being of retirees, potentially enhancing their quality of life without disproportionately affecting state revenue in the long term.

Summary

Senate Bill 197 proposes a phased exemption for capital gains income from state individual income tax for individuals aged 65 and older. The bill aims to reduce the tax burden on older residents by allowing them to retain a larger portion of their investment income over a defined five-year period. The exemption starts at 20% in the first tax year, gradually increasing to 100% by the end of the fifth year, which could significantly assist retirees in managing their financial resources more effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 197 is generally favorable among its proponents, who view the bill as a necessary measure to support the elderly population in Louisiana. Advocates argue that this financial relief is essential for many seniors who rely heavily on fixed incomes. However, there are concerns regarding the long-term implications of reduced state tax revenue, which may lead to criticisms from fiscal conservatives who prioritize budgetary balance.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the potential fiscal impact on the state budget and concerns about equity. Opponents of the bill may argue that tax exemptions for capital gains could favor wealthier seniors and reduce necessary funding for public services. There are fears that as the state adapts to these exemptions, essential services could suffer due to decreased funding, which may compete with the interests of other demographics in the state.