Louisiana Senate Bill SB228

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/25/11

Caption

Provides relative to the dedication of funds in the state treasury.(gov sig)

Impact

The implementation of SB228 is expected to have significant implications for state laws concerning fiscal management and appropriations. By defining a specific fund for overcollected revenues, the bill promotes a structured approach to funding vital public services, particularly in the realms of education and healthcare. This could lead to a more stable financial environment for these sectors, allowing for better planning and resource allocation based on consistent funding from the designated fund.

Summary

Senate Bill 228, introduced by Senator Chaisson, focuses on the establishment of the Fiscal Year 2012 Overcollections Fund within the Louisiana state treasury. This bill is designed to allocate funds specifically for recurring expenses in education and healthcare. By creating this special fund, the legislature aims to ensure that excess revenues generated in the given fiscal year are dedicated toward these essential public sectors, thereby reinforcing their funding amidst fluctuating economic conditions.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB228 appears to be cautiously optimistic. Proponents of the bill largely view it as a proactive measure that will secure additional funding for critical areas of public service, reflecting a commitment to improving quality of education and healthcare in the state. However, there are concerns among some legislators about the long-term sustainability of such funds and the necessity to govern them effectively to prevent misallocation or underutilization.

Contention

Despite the supportive outlook, various points of contention exist concerning the bill's approach and implications. Some lawmakers question whether creating a designated fund may limit the legislature’s flexibility in handling state finances during fiscal emergencies. Critics argue that while the intent to enhance funding for vital services is commendable, tying funds to specific overcollections might restrict overall financial strategies in addressing comprehensive state needs.