Louisiana House Bill HB109

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/2/12
• Engrossed: 4/9/12
• Refer: 4/10/12
• Report Pass: 4/17/12
• Enrolled: 4/26/12
• Chaptered: 5/4/12
• Passed: 5/4/12

Caption

Repeals provisions relative to the production and marketing of livestock

Impact

The repeal of these regulations is anticipated to positively impact farmers and ranchers involved in livestock production by reducing bureaucratic red tape. Supporters of the bill argue that these regulations have created unnecessary barriers to livestock management and unsold inventory. By deregulating the use of stallions and jacks, the legislation intends to allow more flexibility for livestock producers, which may enhance the overall efficiency and profitability of livestock operations in the state.

Summary

House Bill 109, introduced by Representative Champagne and Senator Thompson, seeks to repeal certain provisions related to the production and marketing of livestock under the Louisiana Revised Statutes. Specifically, the bill targets the regulatory framework governing the use of stallions and jacks, thereby removing sections that detail how these animals are to be treated within the context of livestock management. This legislative change aims to streamline the processes involved in livestock marketing by eliminating what proponents see as outdated regulations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 109 appears largely supportive among agriculture stakeholders and industry representatives who view the repeal as a step towards modernization. They argue that adapting to contemporary practices is essential for the competitive positioning of Louisiana's agricultural sector. Conversely, there may be concerns among advocates for animal welfare, who might worry that deregulation could lead to inadequate oversight in terms of animal care and market fairness.

Contention

While the bill received unanimous support during its voting session, potential areas of contention include the implications for animal welfare standards and the regulatory mechanisms that ensure the ethical treatment of livestock. Opponents of deregulation may argue for the need to maintain some level of oversight to prevent abuse or mismanagement in livestock practices. However, the overarching narrative during discussions has focused on the importance of reducing regulatory burdens and promoting agricultural autonomy.