Louisiana House Bill HB1156

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/3/12
• Refer: 4/4/12

Caption

Provides relative to multiple requests for criminal history record information for an individual

Impact

The implementation of HB 1156 would notably alter how criminal history records are managed and disseminated in Louisiana. By requiring the bureau to retain copies of criminal history information, the bill seeks to promote greater accessibility for employers and entities that need these records to assess individuals for various purposes. It is expected to decrease the frequency of redundant requests and minimize delays in the hiring and licensing processes.

Summary

House Bill 1156 aims to streamline the process of accessing criminal history record information for employment and licensing purposes. The bill mandates that the Bureau of Criminal Identification and Information must retain a certified copy of the criminal history information provided to any requesting entity, allowing subsequent requests for information on the same individual to be fulfilled from this retained copy. This change intends to simplify procedures, reduce costs, and improve the efficiency of information sharing between agencies and employers.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be supportive among employers and entities that rely on timely access to criminal history records. Proponents argue that the bill will lead to a more efficient and cost-effective system, ultimately benefiting both employers and potential employees. However, concerns may arise from advocacy groups regarding the implications for privacy and how such retention could affect individuals' rights and opportunities.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 1156 could stem from the potential risks associated with retaining criminal history information. Critics may voice concerns over how this could affect individuals with a history that might not represent their current circumstances or suitability for employment. There may also be debates on the balance between efficiency in accessing criminal records and safeguarding privacy, as well as the responsibilities of the bureau in managing sensitive information.