Louisiana House Bill HB1182

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/3/12
• Refer: 4/4/12

Caption

Provides in the event of privatization of the state's support and services centers for the developmentally disabled

Impact

This legislation, if enacted, will modify the existing framework governing the operations of state developmental centers, specifically regarding governance and service delivery. By institutionalizing a process for privatization that reinforces resident care and family input, HB 1182 aims to enhance the quality of life for individuals with developmental disabilities in state facilities. The reporting requirements imposed on the Department of Health and Hospitals will allow for accountability and transparency in monitoring the outcomes of privatization, particularly in terms of cost implications and employment impacts for center personnel.

Summary

House Bill 1182 addresses the privatization of the Northlake Supports and Services Center (NLSSC) and Northwest Supports and Services Center (NWSSC) in Louisiana, focusing on the provision of services to individuals with developmental disabilities. The bill sets forth guidelines to ensure that the selection of private service providers takes into account the best interests of residents, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a continuum of care. It also emphasizes the need for family involvement in the selection process, allowing family associations to play a role in determining provider qualifications and contract specifics.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1182 appears generally supportive among those who prioritize the welfare of residents and family engagement in care decisions. Advocates of the bill argue that by prioritizing continuity of care and family involvement, it enhances service provision. However, there may be some concern regarding the potential implications of privatization on employment for existing staff, as well as the overall quality of care when services are transitioned to private entities. The bill has prompted discussions about the balance between efficiency and care quality in public services.

Contention

Notable points of contention in the discussions around HB 1182 include concerns regarding the method of provider selection and the potential for privatization to diminish the quality of services provided. The emphasis on selecting non-profit providers raises questions about whether this preference truly serves the best interests of residents or potentially limits options. Additionally, stakeholders may debate the effectiveness of the reporting requirements in ensuring quality care post-privatization, with some advocating for stricter oversight to prevent potential service cuts or reduced care standards.