Louisiana House Bill HB358

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12

Caption

(Constitutional Amendment) Requires annual adjustments in the tax on gasoline, motor fuels, and special fuels in accordance with the Consumer Price Index beginning Jan. 1, 2014

Impact

If passed, HB 358 would significantly impact state revenue from fuel taxes. By linking tax adjustments to the Consumer Price Index, the legislation would guarantee that these taxes keep pace with inflation, thereby safeguarding the state's income derived from such taxes. This approach aims to prevent a decline in revenue that could result from stagnant tax rates amid rising costs. The proposed changes will necessitate careful monitoring of the CPI and could require adjustments to budget planning and expenditures related to transportation and infrastructure funding.

Summary

House Bill 358 is a proposed constitutional amendment aiming to require annual adjustments in the taxes levied on gasoline, motor fuels, and special fuels, beginning January 1, 2014. The bill mandates that these tax rates be adjusted in accordance with increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), ensuring that the rates do not decrease below those imposed on December 31, 2013. This legislation is intended to maintain the purchasing power of tax revenues from fuel, in light of inflationary trends.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 358 is likely to be mixed. Supporters argue that the bill provides a necessary mechanism to ensure stable revenue for vital services linked to fuel taxes, such as road maintenance and infrastructure improvements. Opponents may express concerns regarding the impact of higher fuel taxes on consumers, particularly in times of economic hardship, arguing it could disproportionately affect lower-income citizens who rely heavily on transportation. The debate is expected to touch upon broader issues of economic fairness and the role of government in regulating taxes.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 358 include the balance between maintaining state revenues and the potential burden on taxpayers. Critics may highlight that while the intention is to secure funding for essential services, increased gasoline taxes could lead to higher costs for consumers, which in turn may stimulate opposition from various advocacy groups. Discussions around this bill could also explore broader topics such as state budget needs versus individual financial constraints, creating a complex dialogue on the merits of indexing taxes to inflation.