Louisiana House Bill HB366

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12

Caption

Provides relative to the counting of votes cast by persons who die prior to the opening of the polls on election day

Impact

If enacted, HB 366 would amend the current voting laws, specifically by repealing a provision that disqualifies absentee and early voting ballots from being counted if the voter dies prior to election day. This move is seen as a revision of existing regulations to enhance voter inclusion and ensure that absentee ballots cast by deceased individuals are still viewed as valid. The change may prompt discussions about the implications for election results and the integrity of the voting process, as it acknowledges the possibility of counting votes in a somber context.

Summary

House Bill 366 focuses on the voting process in Louisiana regarding individuals who cast absentee ballots or participate in early voting but then pass away before the polls open on election day. The bill proposes to repeal existing laws that prevent the counting of these votes, effectively allowing ballots cast by individuals who die before the election to still be counted. This legislative change aims to clarify the voting process and potentially include more votes in the final tally, adhering to the principle that every vote should be counted regardless of circumstances surrounding the voter’s death.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 366 appears to be primarily focused on voter inclusion and fairness. Advocates for the bill argue that repealing the rule about deceased voters ensures that legitimate votes are not disregarded due to circumstances beyond the voter's control. Critics may question the judgment of counting these votes and raise concerns over potential manipulation or backdoors. Overall, there is a strong push for maintaining the integrity of the electoral process while balancing inclusivity for voters who have already expressed their electoral choices.

Contention

Controversies surrounding HB 366 could arise from differing perspectives on election integrity and the appropriate treatment of votes cast under unusual circumstances. While proponents aim to ensure that all voices are heard, opponents might emphasize the risks of compromising the legitimacy of the electoral process. Therefore, the debate likely revolves around the tension between enhancing access to voting versus maintaining stringent regulations that govern the counting of ballots, reflecting deeper issues of trust in the electoral system.