Louisiana House Bill HB519

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Refer: 4/11/12
• Refer: 4/12/12

Caption

(Constitutional Amendment) Merges the duties and functions of the Board of Parole into the Board of Pardons and creates the committee on parole of the Board of Pardons (EG +$94,192 GF EX See Note)

Impact

The implications of HB 519 are far-reaching, especially for individuals convicted of non-violent crimes. The bill stipulates that first offenders of specified non-violent crimes will be automatically pardoned upon completion of their sentences without needing recommendation from the Board of Pardons or action from the governor. This change reduces barriers for reintegration into society for certain offenders, reflecting a shift in focus towards rehabilitation rather than continued punishment for lesser offenses.

Summary

House Bill 519 proposes a significant change to Louisiana's criminal justice framework by merging the functions of the Board of Parole into the Board of Pardons. This bill aims to streamline the processes associated with pardons and parole, altering the governance structure and potentially enhancing efficiency in handling cases of inmates eligible for pardons. Under this revised structure, a new committee on parole would be created within the Board of Pardons, thus integrating the duties previously managed separately by the two entities into one cohesive governing board.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 519 appears to be mixed, with proponents viewing it as a progressive reform that could lead to a more equitable justice system and alleviate the burden on the state prison system. Supporters advocate that automatically pardoning first-time offenders could reduce recidivism and foster community reintegration. Conversely, there are concerns about the effectiveness of such an approach and whether it might undermine the seriousness of non-violent offenses, potentially causing division among lawmakers and stakeholders.

Contention

Notably, the bill has generated some contentious debates, particularly regarding the balance of power and decision-making authority. Critics worry about the implications of merging the boards and whether it might lead to a loss of checks and balances within the pardoning process. Questions have been raised regarding how these changes will affect oversight and transparency, especially considering the historical context of pardons in Louisiana. The proposed amendment is set to be decided by the state's electorate, which will ultimately shape its acceptance and implementation.