Louisiana House Bill HB768

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/25/12
• Engrossed: 5/8/12
• Refer: 5/9/12
• Report Pass: 5/30/12
• Enrolled: 6/4/12
• Chaptered: 6/13/12
• Passed: 6/13/12

Caption

Provides with respect to membership on various boards, commissions, and entities that is based on congressional districts

Impact

If passed, HB 768 would standardize how various boards and commissions select their members across Louisiana, ensuring that each congressional district is represented. This bill would make it mandatory for appointments to reflect the population distribution as determined by the latest congressional districts. The implementation of this bill could affect many public trusts and advisory boards, particularly in how they approach member selection and representation.

Summary

House Bill 768 aims to amend various statutes related to the membership structures of state boards and commissions in Louisiana. The bill stipulates that membership on these entities will be designated based on congressional districts, ensuring representation from each district. Furthermore, it includes provisions for maintaining a certain number of at-large members while transitioning to this new framework. The legislation was inspired by the need to align appointments with the updated congressional district maps established by legislative action in previous sessions.

Sentiment

During discussions surrounding HB 768, the sentiment seemed largely supportive among members who emphasized the importance of equitable representation across the state. Proponents of the bill indicate that this change will foster greater inclusivity and ensure that all areas are afforded fair participation in state governance. However, there are hints of dissent from individuals concerned that the shifts in membership dynamics could lead to unfavorable outcomes for certain underrepresented communities, suggesting a need for special considerations within the appointment process.

Contention

A notable point of contention around HB 768 relates to the balance between ensuring proper representation and the potential complexity introduced by changing membership criteria. Critics argue that the bill might inadvertently complicate the appointment process by necessitating changes in existing members’ terms and responsibilities. Some have proposed amendments or clarifications to address concerns that the implementation of such criteria does not adversely affect current members or the stability of the boards.