Louisiana House Bill HB8

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 3/19/12
• Engrossed: 3/26/12
• Refer: 3/27/12
• Report Pass: 4/25/12
• Enrolled: 5/7/12
• Chaptered: 5/11/12
• Passed: 5/11/12

Caption

Corrects the name of an office designated in statutes relative to equal access to governmental and public facilities for the disabled community

Impact

By stipulating that the state fire marshal must consult with the Louisiana Rehabilitation Services when enforcing ADA requirements, the bill addresses practical difficulties that may arise for existing facilities. It allows the fire marshal to grant exceptions under certain conditions after consulting the rehabilitation office. This change is expected to streamline the process for implementing changes to buildings requiring increased access for individuals with disabilities, enhancing their ability to engage in various community activities.

Summary

House Bill 8 aims to amend several statutes related to equal access for the disabled community to governmental and public facilities in Louisiana. The bill modifies existing laws to improve the ability of individuals with disabilities to access these facilities. Key amendments include clarifying the roles of the state fire marshal and Louisiana Rehabilitation Services in ensuring compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. The bill is seen as a step toward enhancing accessibility and contributing to the empowerment of disabled individuals within the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 8 appears to be positive, reflecting a shared understanding among legislators of the importance of accessibility for disabled individuals. There was broad support for the bill during discussions, and its final passage in the Senate demonstrated a consensus on the necessity of these improvements. Advocates for disability rights view the bill as a meaningful advancement toward ensuring equal access, while some stakeholders emphasize the importance of ongoing education on compliance requirements for public and private entities.

Contention

While the bill was primarily supported for its goal of increasing accessibility for disabled individuals, there were discussions regarding its enforcement aspects. Some stakeholders expressed concerns about the implementation of the new requirements and the balance between accessibility and potential costs for building owners. The bill's provisions for waiving certain requirements in cases of extreme hardship were designed to address these concerns, but ongoing dialogue about the implications of such exceptions remains important.