Louisiana House Bill HB93

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12

Caption

Allows the word "parish" to be used in the naming of a nonprofit corporation

Impact

The potential impact of HB 93 on state laws is notable as it modifies existing statutes that govern how nonprofit organizations can identify themselves. By allowing the term 'parish,' the bill seeks to enhance local identity among nonprofits while simplifying naming procedures. It could lead to greater recognition of parish-focused services within the communities, thereby supporting endeavors that aim to improve local governance and services.

Summary

House Bill 93 aims to revise the existing regulations concerning the naming of nonprofit corporations in Louisiana by permitting these organizations to include the word 'parish' in their names. Previously, there were significant restrictions that prohibited the use of the term 'parish' unless certain criteria were met, specifically for nonprofits created prior to 1925 focused on improving parish government. The proposal now extends this allowance to all nonprofit corporations incorporated in the state, effectively broadening the scope of permissible names for these entities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 93 appears to be generally positive, particularly among nonprofit organizations that may benefit from the flexibility in naming options. By recognizing local governance structures, support for the bill might also extend from those who view this change as a way to foster community engagement. However, there may be potential concerns regarding the clarity and distinctiveness of nonprofit titles, as broader naming options could lead to confusion among stakeholders.

Contention

While the bill has strong backing for its intention to modernize nonprofit naming regulations, there could be contention regarding its broad application. The existing restrictions aimed to maintain a level of integrity and clarity within nonprofit naming conventions, which some stakeholders might argue is compromised by this legislation. Discussions may arise about the implications of having more entities with similar terms in their names, potentially diluting the unique identities of organizations and leading to issues in public recognition.