Louisiana House Bill HCR6

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/13/12
• Report Pass: 4/4/12
• Engrossed: 4/16/12
• Refer: 4/17/12
• Report Pass: 4/30/12
• Passed: 5/2/12

Caption

Specifies accreditation requirements for exemption from Wildlife and Fisheries Commission rules governing possession of exotic cats

Impact

The passage of HCR6 would have a significant impact on Louisiana's laws concerning the management and oversight of exotic animals. The resolution reinforces the state's commitment to regulating the possession of these animals while allowing accredited entities, like the Zoo of Acadiana, to operate under specific standards. This regulatory adjustment aims to balance the needs of wildlife conservation and public safety with the operational capabilities of zoos and similar institutions.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution No. 6 (HCR6) seeks to amend the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries rules regarding the private possession of potentially dangerous wild quadrupeds, exotic cats, and nonhuman primates. Specifically, HCR6 includes an exemption for the Zoo of Acadiana, contingent upon the zoo meeting the standards established by the American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA) for enclosures. By ensuring that such establishments comply with recognized standards, the resolution aims to enhance the safety and well-being of both animals and the public who interacts with them.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HCR6 appears to be supportive, particularly among legislators who recognize the importance of maintaining rigorous standards for animal care and public safety. The unanimous vote of 30-0 in the Senate reflects a consensus on the need for such safeguards. By promoting the accreditation of zoos, the resolution is viewed as a responsible step towards ensuring that wild animals are cared for in accordance with established best practices.

Contention

While HCR6 has been met with overall support, discussions may arise concerning the implications of granting exemptions to specific entities. Critics may argue that while accreditation is beneficial, it could also create a disparity between those who are accredited and smaller facilities that may not meet the strict AZA standards but still contribute to animal care and education. The resolution exemplifies the ongoing dialogue about the balance between regulation and operational flexibility in wildlife management.