Louisiana House Bill HR158

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/31/12

Caption

Designates the last Thursday in May of each year as bowtie day in the Louisiana House of Representatives

Impact

The resolution does not have a direct impact on state laws, as it serves more as a symbolic gesture rather than a legislative change that enforces or alters policies. However, by establishing an official 'bowtie day,' it may influence social customs within the House and encourage a sense of camaraderie among members, as they embrace a shared tradition in their attire. This kind of resolution underscores the importance of symbolic actions in legislative bodies to promote unity and identity.

Summary

House Resolution 158 is a formal legislative measure proposed in the Louisiana House by Representative Broadwater. The resolution's primary purpose is to designate the last Thursday in May as 'bowtie day' in the House of Representatives. This initiative aims to establish a tradition within the legislative calendar, allowing members to celebrate and perhaps promote the culture of wearing bowties, potentially as a nod to formal dressing during business sessions.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HR158 appears to be light-hearted and positive, focusing on the celebratory aspect of recognizing a specific day for the wearing of bowties. It is likely viewed favorably by those who appreciate tradition and formality in official settings. However, as with any resolution, there may be some who question the necessity or relevance of such designations in the context of more pressing legislative matters.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from differing opinions on the relevance of designating a specific day for bowties, especially in the light of more significant legislative debates and issues. Some members might argue that resources and attention should be directed toward more critical legislative challenges rather than symbolic acts. Nevertheless, as this resolution does not impose obligations or changes to law, it is likely to be a point of minor contention rather than significant debate.