Louisiana House Bill HR75

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/1/12
• Passed: 5/2/12

Caption

Commends Archie Manning and the Manning family for their contributions to the state

Impact

The resolution serves primarily as a formal commendation rather than a legislative change to state laws. It recognizes and celebrates the influence of the Manning family's philanthropic efforts and their contributions to education and community development. By endorsing this resolution, the legislative body reinforces the values of community service and encourages similar contributions from other citizens, promoting the importance of active civic engagement.

Summary

House Resolution 75 (HR75) is a commendatory resolution acknowledging the significant contributions of Archie Manning and the Manning family to various entities in Louisiana, notably Nicholls State University athletics, the South Louisiana Economic Council, and the Lafourche Parish Tourism Recovery Program. It highlights the positive impact of the Manning Passing Academy, which has become a staple event at Nicholls State University, fostering both recognition and economic growth in the region. Through this resolution, the House of Representatives aims to honor the spirit of sportsmanship and integrity exemplified by the Manning family.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HR75 is overwhelmingly positive, as it reflects respect and admiration for the Manning family. Legislators supporting the resolution express their appreciation for the family's longstanding commitment to improving the community and promoting youth development through sports. The resolution showcases bipartisan support, indicating a collective agreement on the value of recognizing local heroes and their contributions to state pride.

Contention

As a commendatory resolution, HR75 does not appear to present significant points of contention or controversy. The unanimous gratitude expressed towards the Manning family suggests a shared recognition of their impact on the community. Nevertheless, discussions around similar resolutions can occasionally reflect broader debates regarding priorities in state funding and support for local institutions versus the recognition of individual contributions, though no adverse opinions surfaced in this case.