Louisiana Senate Bill SB273

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 5/14/12
• Engrossed: 5/17/12
• Refer: 5/21/12
• Report Pass: 5/29/12
• Enrolled: 6/3/12
• Chaptered: 6/12/12
• Passed: 6/12/12

Caption

Authorizes the Louisiana Public Service Commission to require a public utility to include a separate line item for franchise fees collected from the utility's customers. (gov sig) (EN NO IMPACT LF EX See Note)

Impact

If enacted, SB273 will modify the way public utilities communicate billing information to consumers. By requiring a distinct line item for franchise fees, it aims to improve customer understanding of their bills and the costs involved. This change may encourage public utilities to adopt clearer billing practices, potentially enhancing consumer trust and satisfaction. The clear segregation of these fees on billing statements will also ensure that consumers are aware of additional costs associated with the services provided by public utilities.

Summary

Senate Bill 273 addresses the issue of franchise fees imposed by political subdivisions on public utilities in Louisiana. The bill authorizes the Louisiana Public Service Commission to mandate public utilities to provide clear and specific line items on monthly billing statements detailing the franchise fees collected from customers. This includes mentioning the name of the political subdivision imposing the fee, along with the total amount or rate charged. The primary aim of this legislation is to enhance transparency and ensure consumers are well-informed regarding charges on their bills.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB273 appears to be generally positive, with strong support for the enhancement of transparency in billing practices. Proponents argue that this measure will empower consumers by providing them with the necessary information to understand their utility expenses better. There is a consensus among supporters that improved billing clarity will lead to better consumer relations and satisfaction. However, while the bill is designed to protect consumer interests, there may also be concerns raised by utilities regarding the potential administrative burden this requirement could impose.

Contention

Although SB273 is viewed positively by consumer advocates, there are underlying concerns regarding how such mandates might affect the operational aspects of public utilities. Some opponents may argue that the bill could create additional complications in billing processes, leading to higher operational costs. The balance between ensuring consumer protection and maintaining efficient utility operations is a point of contention that could influence discussions as the bill moves forward. Additionally, the necessity of transparency may conflict with the existing utility business practices or create confusion regarding billing formats.