Louisiana Senate Bill SB375

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/2/12
• Engrossed: 4/10/12
• Refer: 4/11/12
• Report Pass: 4/24/12
• Enrolled: 5/10/12
• Chaptered: 5/14/12
• Passed: 5/14/12

Caption

Provides relative to the Louisiana Fur Public Education and Marketing Fund. (8/1/12) (EN SEE FISC NOTE SD RV See Note)

Impact

This legislative action impacts state laws regarding wildlife conservation and management, particularly in how revenues from trapping licenses are handled. By facilitating a systematic transfer of funds from trapping fees to the Louisiana Fur Public Education and Marketing Fund, the bill ultimately aims to bolster the state's efforts in wildlife education and market promotion. This is expected to have a positive economic impact on the fur industry as it invests in educational outreach and effective marketing strategies. The law emphasizes the importance of sustainable wildlife practices and the economic opportunities associated with them.

Summary

Senate Bill 375 focuses on the Louisiana Fur Public Education and Marketing Fund by amending the regulations surrounding trapping license fees. The main objective of the bill is to ensure that a specified amount from the fees collected from resident and nonresident trappers is allocated to this fund. This reallocation of funds aims to enhance education and marketing related to the fur industry within Louisiana. By instituting a clear and manageable fee structure, the bill seeks to provide consistent revenue to support the fund's objectives.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 375 appears to be largely positive, particularly among stakeholders in the fur industry who recognize the potential benefits of enhanced education and marketing efforts. The overwhelming support in the voting process (101 yeas with no nays) suggests that legislators view this bill as a constructive means of supporting a niche market within their state. This broad consensus indicates a recognition of the significance of the fur industry and a commitment to its development.

Contention

While the bill received strong support, there may be underlying concerns regarding the adequacy of funding and whether the amounts specified are sufficient for the intended educational and marketing purposes. Critics may argue about the distribution and effectiveness of these funds in advancing wildlife management and conservation goals. However, given the absence of dissent in the voting results, there seems to be an implied consensus on the need for such a fund and its useful role in applying targeted educational and marketing strategies to improve the industry.