Requires the Sabine River Authority to obtain legislative committee and certain local government approval for out-of-state water sales. (8/1/12)
This legislative change heightens the necessary oversight and approval needed for the Sabine River Authority to engage in contracts involving the transfer of water beyond state lines. The requirement of local governing authority approvals aims to ensure that the interests and concerns of local communities are taken into account before significant water resources are sold out of state. The implications for state laws are noteworthy, as it centralizes more authority and accountability in local governance regarding the management of vital water resources, which have become increasingly contentious.
Senate Bill 436 (SB436) aims to amend the powers and duties of the Sabine River Authority concerning the sale of water outside the state of Louisiana. The bill mandates that any contract or agreement that involves the sale, utilization, or consumption of water outside of Louisiana requires the written concurrence of the governor, the Senate Committee on Natural Resources, and the House Committee on Natural Resources and Environment. Additionally, it necessitates the approval of at least two-thirds of the governing authorities of the parishes within the authority's jurisdiction, making the process for out-of-state water sale more stringent.
The sentiment around SB436 appears to be generally supportive among local government officials and some environmental advocates who view the bill as a positive move toward more localized control over water resources. This approach is seen as a way to protect local interests and ensure that out-of-state contracts do not jeopardize the community's access to water. However, some stakeholders might be concerned that increased bureaucracy could hinder opportunities for beneficial contracts that could aid in economic development.
Despite its apparent support, the bill may not be devoid of contention. Critics may argue that the added layers of requirement could delay or complicate necessary agreements, especially in times of urgency or need for water resources. Moreover, there may be concerns regarding the implications for interstate commerce, as strict regulations on water sales could be seen as a barrier that might affect the state's relationships with its neighboring states, particularly Texas, with whom water resources have historically been an issue.