Louisiana Senate Bill SB572

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 3/27/12
• Engrossed: 4/2/12
• Refer: 4/3/12
• Report Pass: 4/25/12
• Enrolled: 5/17/12
• Chaptered: 5/25/12
• Passed: 5/25/12

Caption

Prohibits the purchase of firearms or ammunition with the intent of transferring such items illegally. (8/1/12)

Impact

The passage of SB572 has significant implications for state laws concerning firearm purchases. It introduces stringent penalties for violations, which range from monetary fines of $1,000 to $5,000, along with potential imprisonment for up to four years. The legislation emphasizes the responsibility of individuals in firearm transactions and aims to deter illegal activities linked to firearms, thereby enhancing public safety and regulating the flow of firearms in the state more effectively.

Summary

Senate Bill 572 aims to enact a new provision (R.S. 14:95.1.3) that addresses fraudulent purchasing of firearms and ammunition in Louisiana. The core objective of the bill is to prohibit individuals from purchasing firearms and ammunition with the intent to transfer them illegally. The bill provides explicit definitions for terms such as 'licensed dealer' and 'private seller,' and outlines actions that would constitute a violation of this statute, including providing false information to sellers regarding the legality of a purchase or encouraging others to engage in illegal transactions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB572 is largely favorable among law enforcement and public safety advocates, who see it as a necessary step towards enhancing legal frameworks governing firearms. However, the bill may also draw criticism from gun rights advocates who perceive such regulations as an infringement on Second Amendment rights and personal freedoms. Overall, the discussion reflects a balance between efforts to improve safety and concerns over individual liberties.

Contention

Some notable points of contention include the definition of 'materially false information,' which could provoke debate on what constitutes misinformation in firearm transactions. There may also be concerns regarding enforcement, particularly how law enforcement agencies will determine intent and discern between legal and illegal transactions. Advocates argue that the bill strikes an important balance between regulation and rights, while opponents fear it may lead to overregulation and misunderstandings among well-meaning gun owners.