Louisiana Senate Bill SCR70

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/24/12
• Refer: 4/25/12
• Report Pass: 5/7/12
• Passed: 5/8/12
• Engrossed: 5/8/12
• Refer: 5/9/12
• Report Pass: 5/14/12

Caption

Requests DOTD study four laning LA 73 between LA 30 and I-10 and four laning LA 30 between I-10 and LA 44, all in Ascension Parish.

Impact

If adopted, SCR70 would initiate a formal study that could lead to significant improvements in the traffic flow and overall safety in the area. This study would provide critical insights and recommendations regarding the proposed four-laning of LA 73 between LA 30 and Interstate 10, as well as LA 30 between Interstate 10 and LA 44. The successful completion of this study could set the groundwork for future legislative actions aimed at enhancing roadway capacity in rapidly growing areas of Ascension Parish.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 70 (SCR70) aims to address transportation concerns in Ascension Parish, Louisiana, by urging the Department of Transportation and Development to study the feasibility and costs of widening LA 73 and LA 30. Ascension Parish has experienced significant population growth, leading to increased traffic congestion on these key roadways. The high volume of traffic is attributed to the development of residential subdivisions, retail shopping centers like the Tanger Factory Mall, and local industrial activities, all of which have strained the existing infrastructure.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SCR70 appears to be largely positive, as it seeks to proactively address the growing concerns of traffic congestion which affects residents' daily commutes and overall quality of life. Lawmakers and local stakeholders seem to recognize the importance of improving infrastructure as a means to support the growing community needs. There appears to be a collaboration among various legislative members in pursuit of solutions that will benefit constituents in Ascension Parish.

Contention

While the resolution itself does not propose specific funding or immediate changes to the law, it highlights the urgent need for state action in planning for transportation enhancements. Some concerns may exist regarding the financial implications of such infrastructure projects and how they will be funded. Local residents and stakeholders may also have conflicting priorities regarding transportation improvements versus other community needs, which could lead to future debates as the study progresses and recommendations are made.