Louisiana House Bill HB138

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/8/13

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the matter of "Burnettie C. Toney and Lemuel E. Toney v. Benjamin Ray Robinson, et al"

Impact

The impact of HB138 is primarily financial, ensuring that the state can honor court judgments and legal settlements. By appropriating these funds, the legislature acknowledges its commitment to uphold judicial rulings, which is crucial for maintaining public trust in government accountability. The bill's passage suggests that there may be other similar judgments that could require future appropriations, thereby establishing a precedent for the management of fiscal obligations arising from legal disputes involving state agencies.

Summary

House Bill 138, introduced by Representative Ritchie, is designed to appropriate funds from the General Fund of the state of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2013-2014. Specifically, the bill allocates the sum of $10,000 to cover a consent judgment against the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) in the legal case 'Burnettie C. Toney and Lemuel E. Toney v. Benjamin Ray Robinson, et al'. This appropriation reflects the state’s responsibility to fulfill financial obligations stemming from legal proceedings involving its departments.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB138 seems to be largely procedural, as it addresses a specific legal requirement rather than inciting broader public debate. Legislative discussions on such appropriation bills typically focus on the necessity and appropriateness of funding certain judgments rather than ideological divisions. Thus, the general feeling around the bill can be perceived as supportive of fulfilling legal obligations, with stakeholders likely understanding the importance of complying with judicial decisions.

Contention

While the bill itself does not appear to spark significant contention, it does highlight the ongoing challenges faced by state agencies in handling legal matters and the associated financial implications. Some concerns might arise regarding the source of funds allocated for such judgments, particularly in times of budget constraints. Nevertheless, the bill underscores the necessity of acknowledging and settling legal judgments to avoid further lawsuits and potential financial repercussions.