Louisiana House Bill HB247

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/8/13

Caption

Provides relative to the telecommunication tax for the deaf (OR +$1,000,000 SD RV See Note)

Impact

If enacted, HB 247 would directly modify existing taxation related to telecommunication services used by the deaf. This could result in significant financial relief for individuals who rely on these services to communicate effectively. Adjustments to the telecommunications tax could encourage more providers to offer services that are more affordable and accessible to the deaf community. This, in turn, would promote an inclusive communication environment, ultimately benefiting various sectors, including education and employment for deaf individuals.

Summary

House Bill 247 aims to provide relief and support for the deaf community by adjusting the telecommunications tax imposed on services beneficial to individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing. The bill seeks to redefine the parameters of this tax to promote accessibility and ensure that the deaf community has equitable access to communication services. There is an awareness that the current tax structure poses an undue burden on these individuals, and the intentions behind the bill are to correct this disparity while enhancing overall communication access.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 247 appears to be positive, particularly among advocacy groups focused on the rights and accessibility of the deaf community. Many advocates express optimism that the reform will help alleviate some of the financial burdens faced by individuals who rely on telecommunications services for daily communication. However, there could also be a degree of apprehension from those concerned about the implications of modifying tax structures and how it may affect funding or service offerings in the broader telecommunication sector.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 247 include concerns regarding how the changes to the telecommunications tax may impact the overall funding for communication services. Some stakeholders may argue that any reductions or changes to the tax could lead to budget shortfalls, affecting not only services for the deaf but potentially for the entire community. Additionally, there may be discussions about ensuring that the changes effectively address the needs of the deaf community without inadvertently creating disparities or excluding other important groups requiring assistance.