Louisiana House Bill HB353

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/8/13

Caption

Provides relative to contract limits for certain levee projects

Impact

The impact of HB 353 on state laws involves the continuation of higher contract limits for levee projects. By extending this cap until December 31, 2016, the bill permits local levee districts greater flexibility in managing contracts directed towards urgent infrastructure needs. This change could potentially facilitate quicker responses to a growing list of maintenance and improvement projects that are necessary for the safety of residents and the protection of property in flood-prone areas.

Summary

House Bill 353 aims to modify contract limits for certain levee projects within the Terrebonne Levee and Conservation District and the South Lafourche Levee District. Specifically, the bill extends the existing $1,000,000 contract limit, which allows for work on these levees without the need for public bidding if the project cost exceeds the standard $150,000 limit. By doing so, the bill seeks to streamline the process for procuring services necessary for maintaining and improving levees in these districts, which are crucial for flood protection and water management in Louisiana.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 353 appears to be generally positive among proponents who argue that refining and increasing contract limits for levee projects is essential for effective infrastructure management. Supporters believe that the ability to manage larger contracts without undergoing exhaustive bidding processes can lead to more efficient project execution. However, the bill may face scrutiny from critics concerned about accountability and transparency in public contracts, particularly regarding the oversight of the spending of public funds.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 353 focus on concerns over reducing transparency in public contracting practices. Critics argue that by allowing higher contract limits without requiring competitive bidding, the bill might open opportunities for favoritism and misuse of public funds. There is a fundamental tension between the urgency of addressing levee infrastructure needs and ensuring that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently and responsibly.