Louisiana House Bill HB612

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/8/13
• Report Pass: 4/17/13
• Engrossed: 4/25/13
• Refer: 4/29/13

Caption

Permits use of TOPS awards at eligible La. institutions by otherwise qualified students who graduated from out-of-state colleges or universities (RE INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The implications of HB 612 are significant for state laws regarding educational funding and access. By permitting the use of TOPS awards for graduates of out-of-state institutions, the bill potentially opens up new pathways for Louisiana residents to attain advanced degrees. It encourages students to seek education outside their home state while still benefiting from state-funded scholarships. This could lead to a more competitive workforce in Louisiana, as individuals acquire advanced qualifications recognized by state employment standards.

Summary

House Bill 612, introduced by Representative Greene, aims to expand the Taylor Opportunity Program for Students (TOPS) by allowing students who graduate from out-of-state colleges or universities to use their awards at eligible Louisiana institutions. This change targets first-time college students who may seek postgraduate academic degrees in fields defined by the Louisiana Workforce Commission as leading to 'four or five star jobs'. The bill facilitates opportunities for these students to pursue further education while ensuring they meet specific eligibility criteria set forth in the existing TOPS program.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 612 appears largely supportive, with emphasis on the bill being a positive step towards improving educational access for Louisiana residents. Legislators and educational advocates have expressed approval for the expanded use of TOPS awards, indicating that it addresses the needs of students pursuing higher-level education in competitive job markets. While there may be some concerns regarding the impact of the funding on the state budget, the overall reception suggests an understanding of the necessity to adapt to the changing educational landscape and workforce demands.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the conditions for eligibility and the interpretation of what constitutes a 'four or five star job'. Critics may question whether the focus on job compatibility with educational pursuits places too much emphasis on market-driven metrics rather than educational equity. Additionally, there may be debates on the funding implications for the TOPS program itself and how expanding eligibility could affect current recipients or funding levels. As such, discussions may need to address balancing budget concerns with the objective of enhancing educational opportunities.