Louisiana House Bill HB722

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/30/13
• Engrossed: 5/13/13
• Refer: 5/14/13
• Report Pass: 5/21/13
• Enrolled: 5/29/13
• Chaptered: 6/7/13
• Passed: 6/7/13

Caption

Provides for an additional fee to be assessed on criminal bonds posted in the city court of Baton Rouge (EN +$165,480 LF RV See Note)

Impact

The bill directly impacts the financial framework of the Baton Rouge constable's office by creating a new revenue stream specifically for its operational costs. This could result in enhanced services or improvements in efficiency within the office, given that funds can now be allocated directly from bond fees. However, it also raises questions about the fairness and accessibility of fee assessments for individuals seeking release via criminal bonds, especially in low-income communities where the additional cost could pose a significant burden.

Summary

House Bill 722 aims to establish an additional fee of thirty-five dollars to be assessed on every criminal bond posted in the city court of Baton Rouge. The bill stipulates that this fee will be collected by the constable of the Baton Rouge City Court and will contribute to the operational expenses of the constable's office. The introduction of this fee is intended to provide supplementary funding to support local law enforcement efforts and administrative operations related to the court system.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 722 appears to be supportive from those advocating for bolstered local law enforcement resources, as it introduces a dedicated financial mechanism to aid the constable's office. Yet, concerns may arise among community advocates regarding the equity of imposing additional financial burdens on individuals involved in the judicial system. Stakeholders are likely to weigh the benefits of enhanced municipal funding against the potential adverse effects on defendants and their families.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 722 may include the implications of adding fees to criminal bonds, specifically regarding equity and access to justice. Critics could argue that the increased costs could disproportionately impact impoverished individuals who rely on bonds for release. The bill also leaves room for discussions about the allocation of local resources and whether such a fee structure effectively addresses the broader operational needs of the justice system without over-penalizing those at risk of financial strain.