Louisiana House Bill HB75

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/8/13
• Report Pass: 4/23/13
• Engrossed: 5/1/13
• Refer: 5/6/13
• Report Pass: 5/21/13
• Enrolled: 6/6/13
• Chaptered: 6/17/13
• Passed: 6/17/13

Caption

Provides for a state sales and use tax exemption for sales of certain property to "St. Bernard Project, Inc." and provides for the dedication of certain state sales and use tax monies into the Telecommunications for the Deaf Fund (EN -$1,100,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

If enacted, HB75 will amend existing tax provisions to exempt sales taxes on construction materials utilized by the St. Bernard Project, enabling the organization to allocate resources more effectively towards rebuilding efforts. This could potentially stimulate growth in housing rehabilitation projects within the state, especially in areas recovering from disasters. Additionally, the allocation of one million dollars from telecommunication services sales tax into the Telecommunications for the Deaf Fund represents a targeted financial commitment to assist the deaf community, reflecting a broader legislative focus on inclusivity and support for marginalized groups.

Summary

House Bill 75 aims to provide a state sales and use tax exemption specifically for the St. Bernard Project, Inc. This nonprofit organization is involved in rehabilitating and constructing residential dwellings in Louisiana. The bill also includes provisions that establish a dedicated funding stream from telecommunication services sales tax revenues to support services for the deaf. These allocations are intended to enhance resources available for the deaf community, demonstrating the state's commitment to improving accessibility for all residents.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB75 appears positive, particularly among advocates for the St. Bernard Project and supporters of the deaf community. Proponents emphasize the bill's proactive financial support for essential community services and the promotion of housing recovery initiatives. Critics, if any, may point to concerns about the implications of tax exemptions on state revenue, although the overall discussions seem to focus on the benefits this bill could bring rather than significant opposition. The unanimous Senate vote suggests a broad bipartisan agreement on the bill's objectives.

Contention

Notably, while the bill seems to have strong support, discussion may arise about the impact of tax exemptions on the state's budget and long-term financial implications. Legislators need to consider how prioritizing such targeted exemptions aligns with broader fiscal policies and whether similar support could be extended to other essential community services. Furthermore, discussions may revolve around ensuring accountability for the use of the funds allocated to the St. Bernard Project and the Telecommunications for the Deaf Fund, ensuring that they achieve their intended outcomes.