Louisiana House Bill HCR108

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/6/13
• Refer: 5/7/13
• Report Pass: 5/15/13
• Engrossed: 5/23/13
• Refer: 5/27/13
• Passed: 5/30/13

Caption

Requests the state and statewide public retirement systems to appear before the House and Senate committees on retirement and report relative to the promulgation and distribution of forms regarding pension forfeiture (EG NO IMPACT APV)

Impact

The passing of Act No. 479 in the 2012 Regular Session laid the groundwork for HCR108, establishing the legal framework for the retirement benefit forfeiture process. Legislators expect these measures to enhance accountability for public servants by ensuring they are fully aware of the conditions under which they may lose their retirement benefits. The act also demands that employing agencies provide these attestation forms to every public servant hired or elected post-January 1, 2013, making the distribution essential for compliance with the new regulation.

Summary

HCR108 is a Concurrent Resolution from the Louisiana Legislature that urges and requests state and statewide retirement systems to report on the implementation of provisions related to the forfeiture of retirement benefits for public servants convicted of certain felonies. This resolution specifically calls for a progress report by July 1, 2013, regarding the creation and distribution of official attestation forms that outline these new legal requirements. The impetus behind this resolution stems from a constitutional amendment approved by voters in November 2012, allowing the legislature to establish such statutes governing pension forfeiture.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HCR108 reflects a strong legislative push towards accountability and responsible governance in public service. Supporters view the resolution as a vital step to ensure public servants are cognizant of their legal responsibilities, thereby safeguarding taxpayer interests. On the other hand, some critics express concerns about the broader implications of pension forfeiture laws, arguing they could disproportionately affect individuals facing legal challenges not related to their official duties.

Contention

While HCR108 seeks a straightforward update on compliance with pension forfeiture regulations, the conversation around it is not entirely without contention. Opponents of strict forfeiture laws often highlight the potential for misuse or unwarranted penalties against individuals who may be wrongfully accused. The legislative discussion suggests a balanced approach must be taken to uphold justice while ensuring accountability, making this measure a focal point of ongoing discourse regarding public servant regulations.