Louisiana House Bill HR54

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/22/13
• Passed: 4/23/13

Caption

Recognizes Wednesday, April 24, 2013, as La. Public Policy Conference Day at the state capitol and encourages efforts to inform citizens about multiple sclerosis

Impact

The passage of HR54 has a symbolic impact on state laws by officially designating a day for raising awareness about MS in Louisiana. By promoting public engagement and education on this health-related issue, the resolution aligns state initiatives with broader national efforts to combat MS. This can potentially lead to increased support for research and community programs focused on the needs of individuals with MS, thereby influencing future health policies and funding allocations within the state.

Summary

House Resolution 54 (HR54) recognizes April 24, 2013, as Louisiana Public Policy Conference Day at the state capitol. The resolution emphasizes the significance of raising awareness about multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic illness that affects a considerable number of individuals, particularly those aged between twenty and fifty. HR54 encourages efforts to inform the citizens of Louisiana about the challenges posed by MS and highlights initiatives led by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society aimed at advocacy and support for those affected by the disease.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR54 is predominantly positive. It reflects a commitment from state representatives to support those affected by MS and to enhance public knowledge about the disease. Advocates and representatives who collaborated on the resolution likely view this as a necessary step toward delivering more comprehensive healthcare and support for individuals with chronic conditions. However, as a resolution, HR54 may not invoke significant contention, as it primarily serves an advocacy and awareness purpose rather than legislating direct actions or funding.

Contention

While HR54 is a non-controversial resolution aimed at raising awareness, it may face challenges in terms of actual impact, with questions about the sufficiency of resources allocated towards public awareness and research efforts. Critics might argue that merely recognizing a day for awareness is insufficient if it does not lead to actionable policies or funding for MS-related programs. Thus, while there may be no direct opposition, the effectiveness of HR54 in translating recognition into significant support for MS initiatives could be a point of discussion.