Louisiana Senate Bill SB138

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/8/13

Caption

Phases out the individual and corporate income tax over 10 calendar years beginning in Tax Year 2014. (gov sig)

Impact

The impact of SB138 on state laws is substantial as it modifies established tax rates outlined in Louisiana's revenue statutes. By completely eliminating individual and corporate income taxes, the state aims to streamline its tax code and eliminate complexities associated with tax filings. However, the bill raises important questions regarding state revenue sustainability, as the absence of these taxes could lead to budgetary shortfalls. The potential loss of income tax revenue necessitates alternative sources of funding for state services, which may require increased reliance on sales taxes or other fees.

Summary

Senate Bill 138, sponsored by Senator Morrish, proposes a significant change to the tax landscape in Louisiana by phasing out both individual and corporate income taxes over a decade. Starting in 2014, the bill establishes a gradual decrease in tax rates, reducing them by 10% each year until the complete elimination of these taxes by January 1, 2023. This change is intended to encourage economic growth by increasing disposable income for individuals and reducing the tax burden on businesses, thus fostering a more favorable climate for investment and job creation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB138 is divided. Proponents argue that eliminating income taxes can stimulate economic activity, making Louisiana a more attractive destination for businesses and attracting individuals seeking lower tax burdens. They view these changes as necessary for enhancing competitiveness and encouraging population growth. Conversely, detractors express concerns about the equity of such tax reforms. Critics worry that phasing out income taxes could disproportionately benefit wealthier individuals and corporations while straining public resources and services that rely on tax revenues, particularly those aimed at lower-income residents.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the debate over the long-term implications of removing a significant revenue source for the state. Critics of SB138 emphasize the risks of cutting the income tax without a robust plan for replacing the lost revenue, fearing it could lead to cuts in essential services like education and healthcare. Furthermore, some legislators have called for more comprehensive studies on the economic impacts of such tax elimination strategies to fully understand the potential consequences before enacting such a transformative legislation.