Louisiana Senate Bill SR84

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/6/13
• Passed: 5/7/13

Caption

Requests the Louisiana State Law Institute to study the feasibility and constitutionality of alternative dispute resolutions as a means of resolving "legacy" disputes.

Impact

If the study recommended by SR84 leads to the implementation of alternative dispute resolutions, it could substantially modify how legacy disputes are managed in Louisiana. By potentially streamlining the process, the resolution aims to reduce delays and ensure that environmental damage is addressed in a timely manner. This would not only affect landowners but also the oil and gas industry that is often at the center of these disputes, promoting a balance between environmental protection and resource extraction.

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 84 urges the Louisiana State Law Institute to study the feasibility and constitutionality of utilizing alternative dispute resolutions to resolve legacy disputes. These disputes arise when landowners claim that oil and gas operations have caused pollution and contamination to their property and water sources. The resolution reflects an ongoing concern regarding environmental claims and the processes in place for resolving such conflicts, advocating for a more expedient method of addressing these critical issues.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR84 appears to be generally supportive, focusing on the necessity for efficient dispute resolution in light of environmental concerns. Stakeholders, including environmental advocacy groups and industry representatives, might find common ground in the pursuit of clearer and quicker resolutions to legacy disputes. However, there is an underlying tension regarding the feasibility and constitutional legitimacy of alternative dispute resolutions, which may prompt scrutiny from various angles.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention revolves around the adequacy of alternative dispute resolutions in safeguarding public interest and environmental health. Critics may argue that these methods could undermine the rigorous judicial processes currently in place, raising concerns about oversight and protection for affected communities. The debate will likely hinge on whether the proposed solutions would maintain accountability for the oil and gas industry while promoting efficient resolutions for the benefit of landowners.