Louisiana House Bill HB1067

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/26/14
• Refer: 3/27/14

Caption

Provides relative to certain standards and codes relating to sustainable building standards for state buildings and state-funded facility projects (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

Impact

The bill aims to change the regulatory landscape for state buildings, ensuring that sustainable practices are embedded within construction codes. Currently, state law requires major facility projects to exceed energy efficiency standards, and this bill expands upon that by integrating recognized environmental certifications into building code considerations. This is intended to foster a construction environment that values resource conservation and energy efficiency, ultimately influencing the materials used in state-funded projects.

Summary

House Bill 1067 introduces amendments to the Louisiana Building Code, focusing on sustainable building standards for state-owned buildings and major facility projects. The bill mandates that the office of facility planning and control recognizes certain certification programs, including the American Tree Farmer, Sustainable Forest Initiative, and Forest Stewardship Council. These recognitions aim to promote sustainability in construction practices used by state-funded projects, enhancing environmental standards and energy efficiency.

Sentiment

Sentiment around HB 1067 appears to be favorable among sustainability advocates and environmental groups, as it underscores a commitment to responsible building practices. However, there may be concerns from industry stakeholders regarding the implementation of these standards and their potential impact on project costs and timelines. The debate suggests a push towards aligning state-funded projects with evolving environmental values while also needing to balance practicality and economic feasibility.

Contention

Notable points of contention with HB 1067 may arise regarding the inclusivity of recognized certification programs and the parameters set for sustainable construction practices. Some industry entities could argue that overly stringent requirements might limit material options or increase costs. Additionally, the bill's prohibition against incorporating non-U.S. regulatory criteria may raise concerns about competitiveness and innovation in building materials, challenging the state to maintain comprehensive and beneficial standards.