Louisiana House Bill HB161

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/14
• Refer: 3/10/14

Caption

Requires notification and reporting relative to certain communications made for the purpose of influencing the passage or defeat of legislation

Impact

If enacted, HB 161 would significantly strengthen the existing lobbying laws in Louisiana. The law would enhance oversight by requiring timely electronic submissions of reports, including specifics about the legislation involved and funding sources for lobbying efforts. In addition to regular oversight, the bill establishes penalties for failing to comply with reporting requirements, including daily fines for late submissions and civil penalties of up to $10,000 for violations. This reform aims to discourage misleading or false information in lobbying practices and uphold ethical standards in legislative communications.

Summary

House Bill 161, proposed by Representative Thibaut, seeks to impose strict regulations on communication activities aimed at influencing legislative decisions in Louisiana. Specifically, it requires individuals or entities engaged in certain lobbying activities—defined as an organized series of more than fifty automated calls—to file notifications and reports with the Board of Ethics. This requirement aims to enhance transparency in legislative lobbying by providing detailed accountabilities about the funds involved in such activities, as well as the nature of the legislation being influenced. The bill mandates that any person who receives or expends over $1,000 for lobbying purposes must submit monthly reports until the conclusion of their activities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 161 appears to be largely positive among proponents of government transparency and ethical lobbying practices. Supporters argue that stricter reporting requirements will help curb misinformation and promote accountability among lobbyists. However, there may also be concerns from certain stakeholders about the administrative burdens and potential restrictions this bill could place on lobbying activities, which some may deem as essential for providing input into the legislative process.

Contention

While the bill emphasizes increased accountability, there are points of contention regarding its implications for the lobbying landscape. Critics may argue that such stringent regulations could inhibit the ability of individuals and organizations to effectively represent their interests before the legislature. Additionally, the fines imposed for non-compliance could be seen as excessive. The debate reflects broader discussions about balancing the need for transparency in lobbying activities with the rights of individuals to advocate for their causes without undue obstacles.